ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with cancer are vulnerable population that suffered during the COVID-19 pandemic from SARS-CoV-2 infection and from the pandemic's impact on healthcare systems. We are presenting the findings of MENA Registry for COVID-19 and Cancer (MRCC) regarding the SARS-CoV-2 infection presentation, diagnosis, treatment, complications, and outcomes. Methods: MRCC was adapted from ASCO COVID-19 Registry and included patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and underlying cancer diagnosis including a newly diagnosed cancer in the work-up phase or patients with active cancer receiving cancer therapy or supportive care, or within first year of adjuvant chemotherapy or after one year of curative therapy and receiving hormonal therapy. Registry included data on patients from 12 centers in eight countries in the MENA region, namely: Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Egypt, Algeria, United Arab Emirates, and Morocco. The data included patient and disease characteristics, COVID-19 presentation, management, and outcomes. The follow up is differential as data get captured at different points of disease trajectory for each patient which may not reflect the final outcome. Results: Data on 1345 patients were captured in the study by December 7, 2021. Median age was 57.1 years (18-98), whereas 56.1% were females. The median follow-up was 98.5 days (0-554). The most common COVID-19 symptoms was fever (50.3%) and 26.8% of patients were asymptomatic. Out of the 959 patients with complete data on hospitalization, 554 (57.8%) were hospitalized and 126 of them (22.7%) were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). The majority of hospitalized patients (60%) had respiratory complications and 13.9% had sepsis and 8.5% suffered acute renal injury. As shown in Table, more than quarter of the patients died with 47% of death from COVID-19 or related complication and 60.6% died at home. More than half of the patients were fully recovered from infection. Conclusions: Although more than half of the patients recovered form COVID-19 and more are expected to recover with a longer follow up, the death toll and complications remain high in this patient population. Future analysis of the impact of vaccination and better disease management as well as the impact of newer variants would provide a useful insight on managing this vulnerable population.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an inherently compromised humoral and cellular immunity predisposing to Covid-19 infection. Factors associated with increased risk of adverse COVID-19 outcome is unclear. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to evaluate COVID-19 infection outcome among our myeloma patients and to define the possible prognostic parameters. Patients And Methods: Between March 2020- February 2022, 10 myeloma patients were diagnosed with COVID infection confirmed by PCR test and computer tomography (CT). The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection was classified according to WHO definition as: mild: symptomatic without pneumonia or hypoxia;moderate: with or without signs of pneumonia with SpO2 >90% on room air;severe disease: with symptoms of pneumonia and respiratory rate> 30/min, severe respiratory distress or SpO2 <90% on room air. Critical disease: with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock. In addition, CALL (comorbidity-age-lymphocyte count-lactate dehydrogenase) score was used. All patients were given supportive care including heparin and 0.4 gr/kg/day intravenous immunoglobulin for those presenting with immunoparesis regardless of IgG treshold of 4.0 gr/L. Convalescent or monoclonal plasma was not used. All anti-myeloma treatments were discontinued until full recovery. Results: Baseline characteristics of our patients are summarized in Table 1. The median age at onset of COVID-19 was 62 years. Three patients were therapy naive, two newly diagnosed MM and one with smoldering MM. At the time point of COVID-19 diagnosis, eight patients were being followed without treatment. Twenty patients were followed out-patient without any treatment and with full recovery. Eighteen (16%) patients were admitted to ICU and 13 (12%) required invasive mechanic ventilation. Two patients received hydroxychloroquine, 68 received favipiravir, one patient received anakinra and two patients received tocilizumab. Full recovery from COVID-19 infection with regression of clinic symptoms and achievement of PCR negativity of COVID-19 was observed in 93 (84.5%) patients and 17 (15.5%) patients died due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia with respiratory and multi-organ failure. No death due to thromboembolic event was observed. As expected, high CALL risk score (HR:0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.48) and higher COVID severity grade (HR:0.26 (95% CI: 0.07- 0.97) were detrimental. Age did not have an impact. However response <VGPR (HR: 3.1 (95% CI: 1.0-9.6);p=0.04) or immunoparesis (HR: 6.59 (95% CI: 1.44-30.1);p=0.01) were correlated (Kappa CE: 0.212, p=0.03) and associated with worse COVID-19 outcome (Figure 1-2-3). In MVA with age, response, Call score, vaccine, immunoparesis entered in the model only immunoparesis was significant (HR: 6.5, p=0.016). Mortality prior to introduction of vaccines reduced to 3.6 % compared with 11.8 % at the pre-vaccine period. There was a trend to increase in Covid infection incidence recently due to the Omicron variant. Conclusion: Among 110 MM patients, the mortality rate is less than the one reported by IMS during the beginning of the pandemic. In our experience COVID-19 infection severity and mortality decreases with anti-Covid vaccination, response ≥VGPR or lack of immunoparesis. Importantly, MM patients with COVID-19 infection need close monitoring for severe COVID-19-related complications, and correction of humoral immunity may be life-saving. .
ABSTRACT
Objective: Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates were not in the expected levels before the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among patients with cancer. However, pandemic conditions may have changed the attitude of patients. In this study, we aimed to assess current influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates of patients with cancer and changing attitudes toward vaccination in these patients. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary cancer center in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire consisting of 20 items was used. Results: A total of 309 patients completed the questionnaires. Most patients did not get a flu shot and pneumococcal vaccine before the COVID-19 pandemic (74.1% for flu shot and 84.1% for pneumococcal vaccine). Moreover, 144 patients (46.6%) stated that they were considering to get a flu shot, and 133 (43%) were considering to get a pneumococcal vaccine because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Only 35 patients (11.3%) got a flu shot, and 56 (18.1%) got a pneumococcal vaccine during the COVID-19 pan-demic. Conclusion: Vaccination rates for seasonal influenza and pneumococcal infections were low in patients with cancer before the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the number of patients who want to be vaccinated against seasonal influenza and pneumococcal infections increased in the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients vaccinated with these vaccines is still low. © 2021 by Turkish Society of Medical Oncology.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare systems globally and resulted in the interruption of usual care in many healthcare facilities exposing vulnerable cancer patients to significant risks. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of this pandemic on cancer care worldwide. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using validated electronic questionnaire of 51 items via SurveyMonkey©. The tool was distributed to leaders in oncology centers worldwide. The questionnaire obtained information on the capacity and services offered at these centers, magnitude of interruption of care, reasons for interruption, challenges faced, interventions implemented, and the estimation of patient harm during the pandemic. Results: 356 centers from 54 countries across six continents participated between April 21 and May 8, 2020. These centers serve about 700,000 new cancer patients a year. Most of them (88%) reported facing challenges in providing care during the pandemic. 54% and 45% of centers reported cases of COVID-19 infection among their patients and staff, respectively. Although 51% reduced services as part of a preemptive strategy, other common reasons included overwhelmed system (20%), lack of personal protective equipment (19%), staff shortage (18%), and restricted access to medications (9.7%). Missing at least one cycle of therapy by more than 10% of patients was reported in 46% of the centers. Most centers implemented virtual clinics (83.6%) and virtual tumor boards (93%) and participants believed these will persist beyond the pandemic (55.5% and 60%, respectively). Centers performed routine tests in laboratories near patients’ homes (76%) and shipped medications to patients (68.6%). Participants reported patients’ exposure to harm from interruption of cancer-specific care (36.5%) and non-cancer related care (39%) with some centers estimating up to 80% of their patients exposed to some harm. Only 16% of the centers reported services are back to baseline at the time of completing the survey. Conclusions: The detrimental impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care is widespread with varying magnitude among centers worldwide. Further research to assess this impact at the patient level is required. A “new normal” of cancer care emerged with emphasis on telehealth and care delivery closer to home. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: A.R. Jazieh: Research grant/Funding (self): MSD. C.D. Rolfo: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca;Advisory/Consultancy: Inivata;Archer;MD Serono;Mylan;Oncompass;Honoraria (self): Elsevier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.